Dinghies in 2020 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2223242526 34> |
Author | |||
tack'ho ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1100 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Remember that well, I was on the comittee boat after we snapped the furball mast the day before! Loads of folks abandoning boats, I lept in and sailed two L2s in after their crews got picked up by safety boats. Once the squwall was through it was only a 4-5. |
|||
I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
English Dave ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 06 Location: Northern Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 682 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Just wondering why we are arguing about a boat's performance in a F6. Of course, boats can be sailed in all conditions (in theory) but no competent RO would set a course above a F5 (and only then in flat water). A F6 is a "hang on for dear life" conditions and doesn't adequately reflect a boat's abilities. You want to tell me you can be fully controlled in a F6 at all times and I'll argue that you are carrying 4m on a wave-board. It's like comparing a Mini to a Ferrari on the basis of them both driving off a cliff. And we are discussing racing dinghies instead. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Smight at BBSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Jan 07 Location: Great Britain Online Status: Offline Posts: 1127 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I'm pretty sure the top level sailors could argue to be in complete control in a force 6. Arguably you don't need complete control, just enough so that the boat isn't controling you. |
|||
RS600 988
|
|||
![]() |
|||
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom/Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 4027 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Force 5, no more.
It barely hit 24 kts that day, top end of a five again.
Windy but sheltered water and a clear example of plate/kite induced tail walking out of control. Surely what you want is a single hander that can be controlled in a force six without those shenanigans and could possibly hit 30 knots, without worrying about pitch poling, tail walking caviation and spin out, like a 4 mtr racing sailboard. Well that's what I want from a boat in the future |
|||
![]() |
|||
Smight at BBSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Jan 07 Location: Great Britain Online Status: Offline Posts: 1127 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
erm......................link your knottage is a bit out chap If you wanna do 30knots just get on your windsurfer. If you want to sail singlehanded dinghies then you can pretty much forget 30knots and 25 off foils is servely pushing it. There's too much drag from a single hander . A moth is fast becasue its on the foils. Edited by Smight at BBSC |
|||
RS600 988
|
|||
![]() |
|||
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom/Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 4027 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
That's where design comes in. Stepped hulls, inverse chines, plenty of hulls plane at 30 knots, sailboards didn't start off doing 30 kts they were the same speed as dinghies, they just developed further faster, whereas Dinghies developed faster in light winds by being over powered which then required more weight to hold them down and as I've said before all the design thinking has always been a bit single track, no-one really thinks out of the box. Sailboards didn't have mast tracks or retracting centreboards or the rest of the paraphenalia until we tried it. This thread is about 2020, I'd hope by then we would have a s/h dinghy capable of 30 kts speed, it's simply about controlling the power and matching it to the planing area of the hull and ensuring one reduces as the other increases. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Stepped hulls, inverse chines and flat rocker increase drag at low speeds,
like the Warp X380 shows*. You're right, you don't have innovations unless you try things, but the dinghies have also had a huge number of innovations over the past few decades; hydrofoils, wings, assymetric spinnakers, high-tension rigs, floppy-top rigs, floppy-bottom rigs, tunnel hulls, short hulls, long hulls, scow hulls, skinny hulls.... And dinghies didn't just develop as you claim - most of the most advanced ones are no more "overpowered" in light winds these days than they were years ago, and they often need LESS weight to hold them down these days. And is there much evidence to show that boards developed further faster in terms of speed around the course over the normal dinghy course? As you say, when the boards came out they were about the same speed as a comparable dinghy (ie Laser or Moth). Now the most radical course- racing board (Formula) is a bit faster than the fastest comparable dinghy (Moth) in medium to strong winds, but in the light stuff the Moth is miles quicker. So some boards are faster in a breeze than the dinghies; that's no great drama since something like an MPS is much quicker in the light stuff than a (non-pumping) board. Respect is due all-round, and since the boats ARE advancing as quickly as the boards it seems that there's not as much space for speed improvements in 11 years as you think. And maybe we should applaud the dinghies for maintaining their racing numbers better than boards did, and learn from that. PS Yes, boards have developed more than dinghies for strictly medium to big wind sailing on open water, but that's because that's an aspect of sailing that dinghies rarely bother about. It would be interesting to see just what 30 years of developing dinghies to go down a speed course would have produced. *For non-windsurfers, that's a long Raceboard with a step at the back. It also has an infill piece that you leave out for strong winds, but put in place for light winds to give the board a normal even rocker line, which is a recognition of the fact that steps are slow in the light. Great board, but maybe not the most practical idea for dinghies. Edited by Chris 249 |
|||
![]() |
|||
simonjohn ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 25 Jul 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Might be more practical for dinghies: they have the space, and can carry the weight, for some kind of adjustable on-the-move hull profile. Marine equivalent of the swing wing?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
DaveT ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 31 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 76 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Its being tried on boards but for different reasons, interesting but unlikely ever to be practical on a boat |
|||
![]() |
|||
Skiffybob ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 842 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Quote - "Windy but sheltered water and a clear example of plate/kite induced tail walking out of control." GRF, you don't have talk c**p somtimes. The nose-up is a result of lift from the kite, and the boats were in complete control (only 1 boat capsized once, beause a toe loop let go). Anyway, I agree with BBSC about the "F6 obsession". The average wind speed in this country is about 8-14kts, so what you really want is a boat that's optimised for that. This then makes them over-powered in a F6 (unless you have multiple rigs of course). At the end of the day, a good boat goes well on "the majority" of days, so most classes are designed to work well in 5-20kts (with best performance at the 10-15kt range), which in this country is the right answer, hence why most hull shapes are quite moderate with quite a bit of rocker and curvature. |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2223242526 34> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |